Updates from October, 2009 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Carmen 11:48 am on October 5, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Review of Raw Minerals 

    So I recently tried a free trial from glow.com (I am not linking it because no one should be visiting this site) for only $4.95!  That is until 30 days go by and if you don’t read the fine print (i didn’t) then they charge you a whole lot more!  I called and they are refunding me half – but its not good enough. Especially because their product sucks.  And I’m not just saying that because I failed to read the fine print.  I’m saying it because its the gosh darn truth.  If you want your face to age 10 years right in front of your eyes then by all means cake on the Raw Minerals!  They want you to believe that this 4 (four!!) step process of putting foundation on your face will make you glow like the airbrushed models in their ads.  I’m not that much of a sucker ok, I live in reality, I know what photoshop is, but I thought I would try it.  With each new layer I put on it was like the natural glow of my skin (yes, i have that) disappeared only to be replaced by a desert… a cakey, dry desert…on my face.  And no, its not because I didn’t apply it right.  I think any time you are required to put 4 layers of stuff on your face its not going to look good.  I knew that already somewhere in the recesses of my brain, but now I know it for REAL!

    reviewequalsLL

     
    • Olga 3:28 am on October 6, 2009 Permalink

      Whoa there Silver! Thems are fightin’ words! I’m getting the feeling that you might not think too highly of the above product. I found a jar of this product on my bathroom floor just a few weeks ago (i think a guest dropped it and left it). Anyway, I tried it out because I’m always game for new facial product and well… it was free. I thought it looked good for the first 30 minutes or so.. then it went flat and had a drying effect on my skin. Of course I had only one layer on, I can only imagine what 4 layers would do!

    • Emilily 11:20 am on October 6, 2009 Permalink

      Oh, the fine print. I am embarrassed to admit, I fell for one of those a few months back and bought, of all the snake-oil hocus-pocus loony-bin products, a bottle of acia berry multi-vitamins. It was during one of my ill-advised attempts to kick the caffeine habit, and I thought “maybe this will help me off coffee, and hey, it’s a free sample, what could go wrong?” Oh, famous last words. You know what happened – I had to call and argue with this obnoxious call center in Indonesia after they tried to tell me I had signed up for a one-year supply, delivered and chargeable monthly. The fine print actually said you had 30 days to cancel, but when I called within the 30 days, they said the return policy had recently been changed to 14 days, how shady is that?! Finally, I called my bank and they helped me block the charges; apparently, they have an SOP for just this type of scenario because I guess I was like the 10,017th person to fall for it. What a sucker.

      Four layers of face product is excessive, I agree. But I see how you were tempted by the promise of glowing skin; the luminosity of my aging skin is something that keeps me up at night. Seriously.

    • Carmen 11:28 am on October 6, 2009 Permalink

      Emily, losing sleep over your aging skin is exactly what will cause your skin to lose its luminosity (not to mention sleep apnea). I guess its time to invest in La Mer??

    • Emilily 11:56 am on October 6, 2009 Permalink

      Oh yeah, cause I have way more faith in miracle Canadian seaweed than miracle rain forest berries. Maybe I’ll just burn my money and plaster the ashes on my face instead.

  • Carmen 9:57 am on October 5, 2009 Permalink | Reply
    Tags:   

    Some new favorite words… 

    In honor of our new category of words or language or whatever we were going to call it I thought I would let you know of a couple new words that I’ve learned and I’m going to try and incorporate them into my everyday speech.  Ready? Ok, First (and we can thank Max for telling me about these words) Mise en Place. Literally “putting in place” or “things in their place”.  Its used in professional kitchens usually but it can be used anywhere!  I’m using it while organizing random boxes, while doing laundry, and while driving and getting hit by a drunk driver! That guy was definitely not in his right place! Don’t worry, everything is ok except for my side mirror, which is also not mise en place.

    Ok, second, QA.  I know, its not exactly a word but it stands for Quality Assurance.  I’m sure you could have guessed that.  Some background – “Two key principles characterise QA: “fit for purpose” (the product should be suitable for the intended purpose) and “right first time” (mistakes should be eliminated).”  Its definitely a foreign concept for me to do something right the first time.  I’m more of a trial and error kind of girl.  But I’m trying to change, really! I think I like it because it sounds like good slang too. Like, here are a couple examples where you could use it:

    1) “I’ll be ready in a minute! I have to QA my face!”

    2) “This customer service sucks, we need to QA right on outta here.”

    I think the punctilious authorities might have a problem with me using it this way but luckily they don’t know where I live.  Speaking of punctilious – another of my new favorite words!  I learned it from reading this fabulous article which I’m sure you will find equally interesting considering your logophile tendencies.

     
    • Emilily 11:57 am on October 6, 2009 Permalink

      This is a great post; it is exactly what I envisioned our WORDS category posts to encompass. This weekend I plan on finishing the intro to the WORDS category…and working on our About Us pages, of course!

    • Carmen 12:12 pm on October 6, 2009 Permalink

      Well, this post could be the intro…. that would free up some of your time to work on other things.

    • Carmen 12:12 pm on October 6, 2009 Permalink

      Wait, were you being sarcastic?

    • Emilily 12:18 pm on October 6, 2009 Permalink

      No, I wasn’t being sarcastic – this is exactly what I thought our word posts would be like. I am not exactly sure how I envisioned the word post intro going, but I had thought of doing the post in illustrator and using some different fonts and laying it out all poster-y, and then, if it is possible, making that post “sticky” to that category, so it always came up on top but only in that category…not sure how that would work exactly…

    • Emilily 1:32 pm on October 6, 2009 Permalink

      Oh wait, maybe you thought I was being sarcastic about working on the About Us pages this weekend? Yeah, you’re right, I wasn’t really committing to that. (Just kidding, I am totally looking forward to blog work this weekend!)

c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel